Bulk flowmeters
In 2015 APLMF agreed to summarise the test procedures used in each APLMF training course and then to survey its members to validate the test procedures and to provide some quality control. The validated test procedures will be later used to develop eLearning modules.
The summary test procedures are provided to guide economies wishing to follow OIML recommendations. They contain abbreviated terms and formulae which are defined in the relevant OIML recommendation.
Information relating to bulk flowmeters:
The summary test procedures are provided to guide economies wishing to follow OIML recommendations. They contain abbreviated terms and formulae which are defined in the relevant OIML recommendation.
Information relating to bulk flowmeters:
SUMMARY OF TEST PROCEDURES USED TO VERIFY BULK FLOWMETERS
- These test procedures are based on OIML R 117.
- Please note tests used to compile this summary are fully described in the document 5.2 NITP Verification of Bulk Flowmeters.
Test Name |
Procedures Description |
VISUAL INSPECTION |
|
INDICATING DEVICE Mechanical Indicator Electronic Indicators |
|
ZERO SETTING Mechanical Indicator Electronic Indicator |
|
NON-RETURN VALVE (Reverse Flow) |
|
INTERLOCK TEST |
|
MAXIMUM FLOW RATE |
|
ACCURACY |
|
REPEATABILITY |
0.3 0.12% 0.5 0.2% |
METER CREEP Only required when the transfer device is a nozzle. |
|
CONVERSION DEVICE Only required for systems fitted with a conversion device. |
0.3 0.1% 0.5 0.2% |
GAS ELIMINATION DEVICE Only required where a gas elimination device is fitted. |
|
LOW LEVEL CUT OFF Only required at:
|
|
PRE-SET Not required if the pre-set device is not used for trade. |
|
ANTI-DRAIN / HOSE DILATION Only required for flowmetering systems which use a nozzle as the transfer device |
|
PRINTING DEVICES |
|
FOR ALL TESTS |
|
SUMMARY OF ECONOMY REPORTS
MEDEA Project APLMF #1: Course on Train the Trainer Course on Verification of Bulk Fuel Systems Using Master Meter
Held in Pattaya City, Thailand the course took place 24-27 July 2017
Held in Pattaya City, Thailand the course took place 24-27 July 2017
Economy |
Legislation |
SI |
MPE used |
Inspector or 3rd party |
Verification periods |
Bhutan |
Bulk flowmetering systems are not controlled |
Yes |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
Cambodia |
Legislation, but bulk flowmeters are not currently regulated |
Yes |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
China |
Legislation |
Yes |
±0.15% for master meters. 0.5% for flowmeters |
Inspectors |
Annual |
Fiji |
Legislation |
Yes |
±0.3% |
Inspectors |
Annual |
Indonesia |
Legislation |
Yes |
±0.2% for master meters. ±0.5% for flowmeters |
Inspectors |
Annual |
Malaysia |
Legislation |
Yes |
±0.1% |
Inspector / Verifier |
Annual |
Mongolia |
Legislation |
Yes |
±0.3%A |
Verification officers |
Annual |
Nepal |
Yes |
Yes |
±0.1% |
Inspectors |
Annual where applicable |
Papua New Guinea |
No |
Yes |
±0.15% |
No inspection |
Annual |
Philippines |
No legislation |
Yes |
Maintained by oil companies. Some oil companies apply international standards |
N/A |
N/A |
Singapore |
Legislation |
Yes |
±0.2% |
Authorised verifiers (AVs) conduct verifications. Meters are sealed by SPRING or AVs |
Recommend annual verification depending on the application |
Thailand |
Legislation |
Yes |
±0.5% for accuracy class 0.5. Repeatability 0.2%. (Practical operation 0.05%). |
Inspectors |
regulation is 2 years but in practice is done every 6 months |
Vietnam |
Legislation |
Yes |
±0.3% |
Verification officers |
Depends on the instrument ‘Group’. Group 2 instruments must be verified annually |
Economy |
OIML compliant |
Type approval |
Issues |
|
Bhutan |
N/A |
N/A |
Lack of resources, testing facilities and suitably qualified and trained staff. |
N/A |
Cambodia |
N/A |
N/A |
Need law and technical experts. Financial support to buy equipment |
N/A |
China |
Yes |
AQSIQ is responsible for type approval |
N/A |
N/A |
Fiji |
Yes. Master meter is traceable certified annually in Australia. |
Rely on Australia’s pattern approval system |
Lack of specialised staff and training. Economic constraints. Lack of infrastructure. |
Looking to implement Quality Management System. Need to review legislation. |
Indoensia |
Yes. OIML requirement adopted for initial and subsequent verification |
Completed by Directorate of Metrology |
Lack of human resources and suitable test facilities |
N/A |
Malaysia |
Yes |
Yes. Certificates of Approval are valid for 10 years. |
MDTCC lacks awareness re legal metrology system, so requirements are not fully enforced as some meters are not pattern approved. |
NMIM is under different ministry which can cause misunderstandings. |
Mongolia |
Yes |
Yes. Valid 3-10 years |
Lack of qualified human resources. No suitable calibration facilities. Low funding. Lack of technical infrastructure. |
N/A |
Nepal |
Not OIML. Further development is required |
No |
Low demand. Lack of specialised staff and resources. No procedures for verification using master meters |
N/A |
Papua New Guinea |
Yes. Australian test procedures have been adopted |
No |
Conflicting legal responsibilities with ICCC. Lack of specialised staff and resources. |
ICCC and NISIT need to work cooperatively |
Philippines |
N/A |
N/A |
Need to make government aware of the importance of regulating bulk flowmeters |
N/A |
Singapore |
Yes. However, AVs use API as reference for the verification of meters rather than OIML |
Yes. Manufacturer’s responsibility. |
Yes. Manufacturer’s responsibility. |
N/A |
Thailand |
Yes, with some limitations |
Yes |
Insufficient number of trained inspectors to enforce regulations. Some regulation requires amendment to reflect current technology |
More training required to ensure staff have specialised expertise. |
Vietnam |
Depends on the instrument ‘Group’. Bulk flowmeters are compatible with OIML requirements |
‘Group 2’ instruments (60 types of instruments) have a mandatory requirement for type approval/pattern compliance and verification. type approval valid 10 years. |
‘Group 2’ instruments (60 types of instruments) have a mandatory requirement for type approval/pattern compliance and verification. type approval valid 10 years. |
N/A |
SURVEY RESULTS ON ADOPTING THE BULK FLOWMETERS TEST PROCEDURES